From Butts to Anti-Littering Taxes

Few smokers understand that cigarette filters are not biodegradable and take the time to dispose of them in the trash, so these bans result in a significant increase in cigarette litter. Most cigarette filters are made of cellulose acetate—in other words, plastic.
LISTEN

COMMENTARY: Indoor Smoking Bans - E Magazine
Protecting Non-Smokers, but Taking a Toll on the Environment?

November/December 2006

By Florence Depondt

Indoor smoking bans are spreading rapidly around the world as cities, states and even countries are adopting a more effective way to protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of second-hand cigarette smoke—banishing smokers to the great outdoors.

Ireland, Norway, the United Kingdom and Italy have banned smoking in workplaces and public buildings, planes, trains, buses, restaurants, bars and other public spaces, and other European countries are likely to follow their lead. Though smoking was supposedly entrenched in France, and this nation of Gauloises puffers was not expected to give in without a fight, a countrywide smoking ban in public spaces goes into effect there in early 2007. In the U.S., more than 150 areas around the country have now eliminated smoking in public places and the workplace, and California is paving the way for smoking bans on public beaches.

While I applaud the introduction of these bans—after all, why should non-smokers suffer from health complications after inhaling second-hand smoke, or come out of restaurants and bars smelling of stale cigarettes?—there has been little consideration of the negative impacts that result from pushing smokers to the great outdoors. Few smokers understand that cigarette filters are not biodegradable and take the time to dispose of them in the trash, so these bans result in a significant increase in cigarette litter. Most cigarette filters are made of cellulose acetate—in other words, plastic.

Cigarette litter has been a problem for as long as people have smoked, and especially since filtered cigarettes became popular in the mid-20th century following the discovery of a cause-effect relationship between smoking and cancer. Estimates from the World Health Organization suggest that close to 1.1 billion people—or one third of all people above the age of 15—smoke. When each of these smokers consumes an average of several cigarettes a day, one can only begin to picture the number of cigarette butts disposed of in streets, parks and other public places every single day. Discarded cigarettes have been reported—prior to any indoor smoking ban—to be as high as 4.5 trillion each year, according to Yahoo News in 1999, and it is estimated that cigarette butts account for 50 percent of all litter in the world.

I have visited many cities that have suffered from the “cigarette butt invasion” following the introduction of indoor smoking bans. The Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment (INCPEN) found that the incidence of cigarette butt littering in London increased by more than 43 percent between 1996 and 2004 as more businesses forced smokers to stand outside. The Irish Business Against Litter organization estimated in 2004 that an extra 200 million cigarette butts would be dumped on the streets every year as a direct result of the government’s workplace smoking ban.

In the U.S., a local news station in California, KBHS/KHOG, reported in 2004 that, although Fayeteville’s new smoking ban has led to cleaner air, concerned citizens and business owners have noticed a dramatic increase in cigarette litter since the ban was introduced. People living in cities with such bans are noticing the growing piles of cigarette butts outside restaurants and bars where smokers huddle. As Jane Bickerstaffe, director of INCPEN, says, “If you look around outside offices, where smokers hang out, you will see cigarette butts piling up. If you make more people smoke outside bars and clubs that is just going to get worse.”

Why does all this matter? Why should we care that more and more cigarette butts are littering our streets following the introduction of these bans? Don’t these cigarette ends just disappear as the streets are cleaned? Unfortunately the answer is mostly no. Many cigarette butts are flushed down storm drains by rain and other water runoff into rivers and oceans before the street cleaner can get to them, and these butts degrade water quality and harm aquatic life.

The paper and tobacco of cigarette butts may be biodegradable, but the filters are not, and persist in the environment as long as other forms of plastic. These filters are composed of a bundle of 12,000 cellulose acetate fibers and are reported to take between 18 months and 10 years to decompose, depending on the environment they’re in. Once decomposed, they remain chemically present in the environment, as they contain up to 4,000 chemicals including hydrogen, cyanide and arsenic. Toxological data has shown that chemicals from discarded cigarette butts are capable of leaching into surrounding waterways. One particular problem is that these leached chemicals are deadly to the water flea Daphnia magna, a small crustacean at the lower end of, but crucial to, the aquatic food chain.

The saddest environmental impact of cigarette butts is their role in the deaths of thousands of marine mammals and birds every year. These wild creatures mistake the butts for food. Once ingested, the butts can lead to starvation or malnutrition if they block the intestinal track, and can also prevent breathing by blocking vital air passages. In 2003, the United Nations International Maritime Organization reported that cigarette litter adversely affected 177 species of marine animals and 111 species of seabirds through ingestion.

There no hard data showing a direct link between smoking bans and increased death of animals through ingestion of cigarette butts yet, but it is likely such a direct link will be identified, notably in coastal cities and states. As the number of discarded cigarette butts continues to grow, so do the number of cigarettes flushed into storm drains. Cigarette litter is actually getting worse in coastal areas, with cigarette butts forming the lion’s share of beach litter. In 2004, half a million volunteers of the Ocean Conservancy’s International Coastal Cleanup picked up an impressive 1.6 million butts from shorelines.

The solution to the cigarette litter problem is simple to implement. First, it is clear that a strong educational message is needed. I came across a pile of studies demonstrating that smokers who would never litter other, bigger objects have no concept that they are littering when they throw their cigarette remains on the ground. One 2000 study by the Environmental Protection Agency of New South Wales found overwhelming evidence that smokers are not aware or do not believe that the cigarette butts they fling have any sort of environmental impact.

Another study by Australia’s Beverage Industry Environment Council revealed that four out of five people observed littering cigarettes do not consider them to be litter. Margaret Hodge of the Volusia County, Florida recycling program summarizes the issue very well: “People don’t understand that the filter of a cigarette is designed to last forever, so they just toss it out thinking that it will just go away. But it doesn’t.” My personal experience has validated the fact that the majority of smokers flick their cigarettes wherever and whenever.

Modifying the littering behavior of smokers is therefore an important step that any city, state or country introducing an indoor smoking ban must take to help reduce increases in cigarette litter. The educational message must be clear and consistent to ensure that behavior is changed for the long-term. I am positive that an important percentage of smokers would alter their littering behavior if they knew that cigarette butts are made of plastic, not cotton or paper, and that they contain chemicals which pollute near water sources and adversely impact wildlife.

According to the Clean Virginia Waterways website, studies have already demonstrated that smoking-related litter can be decreased by 50 percent or more through educational campaigns that underline the negative reverberation of cigarette litter on nature. Australian surveys show the same results.

For the education campaign to work, we need well-placed bins for cigarette butts. In one survey, more than 80 percent of smokers said they would dispose properly of their butts if suitable bins were available. These receptacles need to be where people are most likely to discard their cigarettes, for example at all entry/exit points of buildings and outside bars, restaurants and clubs. Following the introduction of indoor smoking bans throughout Scotland in 2005, the Edinburgh City Council decided to invest in stub-out plates to be fitted to 1,000 bins across the city center to encourage smokers to dispose of butts responsibly. The new plates went hand-in-hand with an advertising campaign encouraging smokers to keep the streets clean, doubled with a £50 on-the-spot fine for littering cigarette butts.

But how do cities pay for all this? The answer is pretty simple, even though smokers will protest heavily: Anti-litter taxes and fines. In some U.S. states, anti-litter taxes are already in place for canned and bottled beverages to support anti-litter efforts. The same could apply for cigarettes, and would go a long way in helping reduce cigarette-related litter. Surely the cost of cleaning up cigarette butts should not fall upon non-smokers!

In the spring 1999 issue of the Tobacco Control journal, researchers actually called for additional taxes on tobacco products to go towards clean-up efforts. The levying of additional taxes on cigarette products to fund environmental campaigns and clean-ups has also been identified as an important way to mitigate the “cigarette butt problem.” Additionally, cigarette-litter fines should be visibly enforced and implemented as part of a comprehensive anti-cigarette litter campaign.

Taking things a little further, the tobacco industry should be encouraged to take an active and responsible role in educating smokers about adequate cigarette littering behavior. While tobacco manufacturers have taken some positive steps at educating smokers about the negative health effects of smoking through ad campaigns and labeling on cigarette packets, they have made little to no effort at any form of anti-litter education.

One significant measure was taken by Philip Morris, which in 2003 began carrying an anti-litter logo on several brands. “We believe we have a role to play on the reduction of litter” said spokeswoman Jennifer Golisch at the time. But the company’s effort was limited, and has not been followed by others. Tobacco manufacturers need to take this role more seriously and adopt a widespread and aggressive educational approach, with messages urging the proper disposal of cigarette butts appearing on cigarette packets and advertisements.

FLORENCE DEPONDT has served as Program Coordinator for the Coral Reef Research Foundation in San Francisco.

CONTACT: Cigarettelitter.org; Clean Virginia Waterways

The Coral Reef Alliance www.coralreefalliance.org/

Referenced Tobacco Control Special communication:

Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use
http://tc.bmj.com/...

Comments

[Khalid Majid]

KHALID Phone Plaza
We are a Standard mobile phones distributor , We deal with phones like Nokia , Samsung , Qtek , Imate , Sony Ericsson ,Motorola Sidekick , Palm Treo and Nextel , which are all very cheap.

They are Brand New/Unlocked and they come with complete accessories.They also come with 1year international warranty. Note : If you buy two you will get one for free.

if interested contact us at [email protected]
PRICELIST FOR NOKIA PHONES IN STOCK :
Nokia 6125 ....$150
Nokia 6136 ....$160
Nokia 6265i .....$140
Nokia 6282 ......$170
Nokia 8800 .....$175
Nokia 770 .....$165
Nokia 8801 .....$180
Nokia E50 ......$130
Nokia E61i......$170
Nokia E70 .....$150
Nokia N70 .....$155
Nokia N71 .....$165
Nokia N72....$175
NOKIA VERTU..$250
Nokia N80 .....$190
Nokia N90 ....$190
Nokia N91 .....$200
Nokia N92 ....$220
Nokia N93 .....$200
Nokia N93i.....$250
Nokia N95 .....$300
Nokia N75 ....$350
Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition ..$250

PRICELIST FOR MOTOROLA PHONES IN STOCK :
Motorola Mpx 300........$300
Motorola A1200 .....$170
Motorola A910.....$130
Motorola E1070 .....$135
Motorola L6 Candybar RAZR ....$140
Motorola Q .....$230
Motorola Rokr E2 ....$190
Motorola V1050.....$145
Motorola V195 ....$135
Motorola V3 (Gold) Edition ....$130
Motorola V3c RAZR for Verizon.....$135
Motorola V3i Dolce & Gabbana .....$165
MOTOROLA V3x (PINK) .....$140
Motorola W220 GSM .....$180
MDA4...................$130
Mitac MIO 8930.........$280

HTC P3600.....$200

Toshiba Phones:
Toshiba 902T.....USD$180
Toshiba 903T.....USD$185
Toshiba 904T.....USD$190
Toshiba TX60.....USD$230
Toshiba TX62.....USD$220
Toshiba TX80.....USD$230

Xplore Phones:
Xplore M70.....USD$175
Xplore M98.....USD$160

PRICELIST FOR IMATE PHONES IN STOCK :
I-Mate JAM ....$190
I-Mate JAMin ....$200
I-Mate JASJAR .....$300
I-Mate K-Jam .....$210
I-Mate Smartflip .....$220
I-Mate SP5 .....$130
I-Mate SP5m ....$120

Philips Phones:
Philips 766........USD$165
Philips 768........USD$175
Philips 968........USD$175
Philips S900......USD$160

Sharp Phones:
Sharp 703SH....USD$170
Sharp 903SH....USD$245
Sharp GX29......USD$175
Sharp SX633.....USD$230

PRICELIST FOR SAMSUNG PHONES :
Samsung U700...$300
Samsung P920 .....$245
Samsung I830....$220
Samsung Serene SGH-E910.....$300
Samsung S401i...$180
Samsung D870 .....$200
Samsung Z710 ....$230
Samsung p900 .....$255
Samsung p860 ......$235

PRICELIST FOR SONY ERICSSON PHONES :
Sony Ericsson K310 ....$125
Sony Ericsson K510 ....$135
Sony Ericsson K610 ....$145
Sony Ericsson K790 ....$180
Sony Ericsson K800 ....$170
Sony Ericsson M600 ....$155
Sony Ericsson P990i .........$230
Sony Ericsson W700i ...$130
Sony Ericsson W810 ....$135
Sony Ericsson W850 GSM .....$220
Sony Ericsson W900i ....$230
Sony Ericsson W950 .....$240
Sony Ericsson W960......$280
Sony Ericsson Z710 .....$240
Sony Ericsson p910i.....$165
Sony Ericsson P1i.......$200

O2 XdPhones
O2 Xda Atom.............USD$300
O2 Xda Atom Exec...USD$310
O2 Xda Stealth..........USD$320

Pantech Phones:
Pantech G670............USD$170
Pantech PG-3600V....USD$165
Pantech PG-6200......USD$175
Pantech PG-8000......USD$170
Pantech PG6100........USD$220

PRICELIST FOR PALM TREO PHONES :
Palm Treo 650 GSM A....$120
Palm Treo 700w ....$140
Palm Treo 750w ..$200

PRICELIST FOR SIDEKICKS:
Sidekick 2......$110
Sidekick 3......$140
D-Wade Sidekick 3 ..$200
LRG Sidekick 3.....$180

PRICELIST FOR NEXTEL
Nextel i930..$140
Nextel i830...$120

PRICELIST FOR QTEK PHONES :
Qtek 8100 .....$110
QTEK 8300 .....$120
Qtek 8310 ....$150
Qtek 8500 ....$155
Qtek 8600 ....$200
Qtek 9000 3G Pocket PC .....$250
Qtek 9100 Smartphone / Pocket PC ....$150
Qtek 9600 .....$250
Qtek G100 GPS PPC and Pharos Ostia GPS Software(US Maps}....$155
QTEK S200 GSM/GPRS Pocket PC .....$190
Qtek S300 .... $200
Qtek 2020 .... $210
Qtek s100 .... $170
Qtek 8020 .... $150
Qtek 9090 .... $230

IPODS:
Apple iPod 30GB (Video) New! -- $105.95
Apple iPod 60GB (Video) New! -- $125.95
Apple iPod Nano 2GB New! -- $85.95
Apple iPod Nano 4GB New! -- $90.95
Apple iPod Shuffle 512 MB -- 68.95
Apple iPod Shuffle 1 GB -- $80.95
Apple iPod Mini 4 GB -- $85.95
Apple iPod Mini 6 GB -- $100.95
Apple iPod Photo 30 GB -- $115.95
Apple iPod U2 SE 20 GB -- $120.95
Apple iPod Photo 60 GB -- $25.95
Apple iPod 20 GB -- $100.95
Apple ipod 80 GB -- $135.95

If interested contact us at [email protected]

[video surveillance]

I applaud how some goverments are protecting their non-smoking population!!

Second hand cigarrette smok is 7 times worst effectcs in health..
so, that's why passive smokers like my, usually suffer from very damagind side effects!!

[metro ethernet]

I think this is very important to try stop this smoking bussiness that everytime justget richer and richer on peoples lifes they should band smoking period!.

[cigarettes]

The solution to the cigarette litter problem is simple to implement.

[Marvin Will]

For those people who can't quit smoking, they must be responsible when throwing the cigarette butts. This task is so simple, but there are some smokers who can't do it. They should be aware about their surroundings.

[xlpharmacy]

It would be a good idea if they invent a cigarette that it is biodegradable but I don't think that they would invest in that.