When deciding to improve the fate of its suppliers employees Microsoft could have included paid holidays and parental leave on top of its 'at least 15 days' of paid time off formula. Unfortunately their concern for new parents does not extend to the suppliers employees nor the fact that if the supplier does not provide paid holidays each day that Microsoft closes its offices constitutes a loss of income for the employees. As far as the least protected employees are concerned, Microsoft decision widens the gap and the inequality: they are going to remain without any paid leave when they have a new child and two more days of paid holidays will mean for them two more days without pay, a significant loss of income. A sobering perspective considering the number of people involved when it could have been possible for Microsoft to be much more inclusive. It's sad to think the newly added Martin Luther King Day as a paid holiday will represent an extra hardship for all those excluded from this improvement, especially since they are the ones at the bottom of the scale.
How long will it take for Microsoft to develop a culture including really all employees, respecting every employee with a less discriminatory approach? Another century?