This meeting is "announced" by two small posters posted along Ericksen. Can that be considered sufficient information? I don't think so.At first I thought the city website did not provide any additional info :( but in fact if you type the date of the meeting within the agenda, then click on the right item on the program for this day you get this "presentation" (pdf format) that is a version of the draft we had presented in June (see below).
I guess if you cannot attend you can still email the city counsellors in charge of public works: Kjell Stoknes, Kim Brackett and Chris Snow.
Who is going to defend the public interest? How can we know if we cannot attend?
I suggest this meeting be recorded (audio) and posted on line so that the people who cannot attend but are concerned could hear what is said.
A digital audio recorder costs $30 and all public meetings can be recorded.
See the previous postings on the saga of Ericksen and Hildebrand that refer (for instance) to the draft (an incredible reading) of this $75K study.
Recent Comments